However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 25, 2016, the Defendant voluntarily accompanied by the report of 112 by the 10th of the taxi operator at the Ulsan-gun Police Station C police box located in Ulsan-gun B, Ulsan-do. On June 25, 2016, on the ground that D, a police officer belonging to the above police box, did not enter the Defendant’s horse, and her left scleeped one time on the hand that D, a police officer belonging to the above police box, did not take the Defendant’s horse.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A written consent to voluntary accompanying, i.e., a written request for adjudication;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no person who has the basic area (from June to January 1) (i.e., interference with performance of official duties and coercion of duties) (i., June to April) (i.e., a person subject to special sentencing] [decision of sentence]; (ii) the content and details of the instant crime; (iii) the Defendant had the record of being punished by a fine for the same kind of crime; and (iv) supporting a young child.