beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.07.11 2017고정1010

도로교통법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 8, 2017, Defendant Non-registered 125cc SYM Bos is a person engaged in driving low-to-to-land, and the Defendant, around 14:40 on February 8, 2017, came to turn to the left the left at the center of the mid-distance distance at the front of the c cafeteria-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to confirm the safety of the course prior to turn to the left and to prevent the accident by checking the left and left of the way and preventing the accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left on the left due to his occupational negligence, thereby damaging the part on the left side of the victim D(23) drive 2,255,000 won, such as the replacement of the victim's side board, from the right side of the Defendant's Otoba to the left side of the two-lanes of the two-lanes.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages, driving the above otobs not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes every month as a result of a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on the actual condition of the accident, a survey report on actual condition, an accident site photograph, inquiry into mandatory insurance, estimates

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8 (main sentence) of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The purport of the relevant laws and regulations providing that automobile insurance for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the traffic accident in this case.