1. The Defendant conspired with B, from March 25, 2010 to the lower patrolman of the same month, provided the said modified game products for customers’ use by installing 40 game equipment “Blu p pop” and raising the scores of the water-driven machine captured differently from the classification received. The Defendant offered the said modified game products to customers’ use, as it had the example function and the function of continuously going beyond the next phase, and the function of continuously going beyond the front phase.

2. The Defendant in collusion with E, B, F, and G:

A. From Apr. 2010 to Apr. 1, 2010 to Apr. 2, 2010, the above game products are offered to customers for use on the second floor of the I doctor’s meeting located in H during the summer period from Apr. 201 to Apr. 1, 201;

B. From Jun. 7, 2010 to Jun. 7, 2010, the “K Game Center” in the J from Jun. 7, 201 to Jun. 1, 201, provided customers with game products that are different from the content of the rating received as mentioned in the foregoing paragraph

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police interrogation protocol on E and B;

1. Article 45 subparagraph 4 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and Article 32 (1) 2 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act ( point of providing game products with contents different from those of the game products for which each classification has been received and choice of imprisonment with labor);

1. Grounds for sentencing among concurrent crimes as prescribed in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (limited to concurrent crimes with punishment prescribed in the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry from June 7, 2010 to the same month);

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for one month to three years; and

2. The crime of this case committed by the Defendant, along with his accomplices, provides 40 games, which add the example function or chain function to the contents of the classification, differently from the contents of the classification, to the customer’s use. The above crime is promoting speculation.