beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.07.12 2017나315626

약정금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of the corresponding parts of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 10 of the second judgment of the court of first instance is " June 4, 2013" as " June 10, 2013."

The second sentence of the first instance court's ruling "Before August 2013" shall be " August 12, 2013".

Then, “Non-entry” in Part 18 of the fifth final judgment of the first instance court is difficult to recognize that the testimony of the witness L of the first instance court alone was based on the premise that the payment for the completed portion would have occurred due to the construction progress since the date of the formation of the instant agreement.

Part VI through 8 of the judgment of the first instance shall be deleted.

No. 6 of the judgment of the first instance court is referred to as "No. 9".

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.