However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, who was aware of the Victim C (the age of 38) at the Internet B meeting, went back from May 6, 2019 to July 7, 2019 with the Victim C, and went back to his house without good appraisal.

On July 7, 2019, the Defendant continued to dispute with the victim C while making a telephone call with the victim on the same day. However, the Defendant, while making a dispute over most of the cost borne by the victim C, would return part of the cost borne by the victim C, and the two eventually come to be hedging.

On July 8, 2018, the Defendant, as seen above, returned to the Defendant’s residence located in the Busan Landong-gu, Busan, after drinking fluora and drinking with the Victim C on July 8, 2018. The Defendant, who did not have a certain occupation at the time, was aware of self-esteem due to the Victim C who discussed the issue of money, and the Defendant, who did not have a certain occupation at the time, was able to participate in fluence because he was aware of the fact that he was fluored and abandoned by the Victim C.

Therefore, the defendant asked whether the victim C will be fladed or "at the end of time", and if the victim C gives a reply that he will be flad with the end of time, the victim C will die with kn and the defendant will also die.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who had a deadly weapon (26 cm in total length, 14 cm in blade) in the Defendant’s residence, had a knife the knife in the retail part of the Defendant, and concealed the knife in the Defendant’s residence, had the knife the knife in front of the Defendant’s residence, and had the knife continuous telephone over several times to ascertain the location of the knife C, and had the knife in Busan E,