대여금
1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
Purport of claim and appeal
1.
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance's explanation concerning this case is to change "this court" as "the court of first instance", "Nos. 1 and 2" as "the court of first instance", and "Nos. 1 and 3 and the court of first instance" as "the court of first instance" in the fourth 10th 10th 10th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 10th 10th 1st 2th 1st 2th 2th 1st 2th 1st 1st 1st 2th 1st 1st 1st 1st 2th 2th
2. Additional determination
A. The Defendants asserted that Defendant B’s drafting of the instant agreement was an expression of intent by mistake in Defendant B, and that it was revoked by the delivery of the preparatory document as of September 26, 2017. However, it is insufficient to recognize that the preparation of the instant agreement was due to Defendant B’s mistake, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that the written agreement was made due to Defendant B’s mistake.
B. The Defendants’ determination as to the assertion of unfair legal acts asserted that Defendant B’s drafting of the instant agreement would be in accordance with Defendant B’s wombs or rashion and thus null and void. However, the entries in the evidence No. 3 alone are insufficient to deem that the instant agreement was drafted by Defendant B’s rash or flash, or that it was remarkably unfair, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.