A. At around 22:20 on November 24, 2009, B is the Defendant’s vehicle.

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle, as it was negligent in neglecting the duty of Jeonju City in the course of the bypassing the bypassing the bypassing the bypassing the bypassing of the D apartment on the surface of the river, while driving the Plaintiff, who was in the bypassing the bypassing the bypassing the bypassing the d apartment on the surface of the d apartment.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including additional number), the purport of whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each of the corresponding items of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated monthly, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

Personal information 1) Personal data: as stated in the annexed sheet for calculation of damages in annexed Form 1 (2) income and operating period: Urban daily wage, the number of working days until he reaches the age of 60), the progress in the external disability and the rate of loss of labor ability due to the state of the de facto depression, 12% of the ratio of loss of labor ability due to the progress in the external disorder and the de facto depression, permanent disability [2% of the annexed sheet for assessment of Mabrid disability IX-B-1, vocational coefficient 3] (b) the ratio of loss of labor ability from November 24, 2009 to February 26, 2010: 10% (the plaintiff is the plaintiff).