On March 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 09:25, at the Busan Maritime Affairs and Daegu C restaurant; (b) at around 09:25, the Defendant was prevented from approaching other female customers from having received a report of 112 report from other female customers who are based on the Defendant; and (c) at the Busan Maritime Affairs and Police Station D's Maritime Affairs and Police Station of Busan, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties by taking the face of the said police officer one time at each time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 136(1) of the relevant Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts [the scope of recommending punishment] [the scope of recommending punishment] The basic area (from June to January 1) (in the event that the degree of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or interference with public duty is minor] / The extent of sentencing comparison between the applicable type of repeated crime and the recommended type of punishment, which are not concurrent crimes: June to one year and six months (decision of sentence] / In the case of this case, the defendant continues to repeat the recent violent crimes, and such tendency appears to have been expressed as it appears in the present case. However, it is highly likely that the quality of the crime may be criticized because the defendant used direct violence against police officers, and the defendant recently seems to have caused serious harm to police officers by identifying and causing serious harm to police officers, and the sentencing guidelines for the defendant was decided within the scope of punishment determined by considering all of his/her recommendations to the defendant.