However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of the B-to-pur vehicle.

On December 11, 2012, the Defendant driven the above car on December 11, 2011:49, and driven the road of 147-7, Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul along a one-lane distance from the side of the breadth to the center distance for the Chinese telephone.

The driver had a duty of care to operate safely by accurately operating the brake system, etc. while living well on the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim C (the 22 years old), who was in the signal atmosphere, to go beyond the front part of the vehicle's left-hand part of the vehicle where the defendant drives, by misunderstanding the speed pedal as a bracal pedal and baling off the front-hand part of the vehicular line, which separates the vehicular road and the delivery.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, by negligence in the above business, due to the victim’s 12 weeks of treatment, such as a pelle managing member of the right pelle and a pelle pelle pelle, etc. which require treatment for about 3 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C의 굔통사고발생상황진술서

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of each on-site evidence photographing statute;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 9 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. An order to attend a lecture under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is one of the victims' injuries, but the error has been pened in depth, has been agreed with the victim, and the primary offender has been the first offender, and other circumstances, such as the family type, family relationship, etc. of the defendant