손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The facts subsequent to the facts do not conflict between the parties, or are acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, evidence No. 12-1, 2, Eul evidence No. 1, 2, and evidence No. 4-1.
A. The Plaintiff (formerly, the Plaintiff Company: the Plaintiff Company is a company engaged in the original business, etc.; the Defendant is a company engaged in the manufacturing and wholesale business, etc. of clothing, and the Plaintiff Company DM Global (hereinafter “DM Global”) is a company engaged in the manufacturing and sales business of clothing.
B. On January 4, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) sent 15,00 of the clothes “NCLIO” type 5 (Class 1, breginging 1, breging 1, breging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creging creg
다. 원고는 2014. 2. 15.경 피고에게 이 사건 제품 중 후드짚업 제작에 사용할 원단 ‘M/grey 30S/1(8%) T/C30S/1 미니쭈리’(이하 ‘이 사건 원단’이라 한다) 6,500야드 및 치마레깅스 제작에 사용할 원단 ‘100% 폴리 특양면 쿠션지’ 10,500야드를 납품기한을 2014. 3. 12.로 정하여 발주하였다. 라. 피고는 2014. 3.경 원고에게 이 사건 원단 6,155야드(당초 발주량과 다른 실제 거래량이다)와 ‘100% 폴리 특양면 쿠션지’ 10,764야드를 납품하였고, 그 후인 2014. 3. 15. 원고에게 이 사건 원단 319야드를 추가 납품하였다.
E. The Plaintiff, as the above original body supplied by the Defendant, produced the Hydrging and Maggging from among the instant products and supplied them to the IM global.
F. However, on May 29, 2014, the instant case was made on the side of the Home shopping.