(2) On the first day of the court of appeal, the defendant asserts only unfair sentencing on the grounds of appeal). The defendant did not have the same criminal record on the second day of the court of appeal, and there are circumstances in which the defendant partially repaid the amount of damage. However, this point appears to have been determined by the court below considering sufficient circumstances, and there are no special changes in circumstances to reduce the amount of damage in the court of appeal, the defendant did not agree with the victim because he did not pay a significant portion of the damage amount, and the defendant did not agree with the victim. In full view of various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character, character, environment, motive, means and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's argument that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, is not acceptable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.