손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
Purport of claim and appeal
judgment of the first instance.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The pertinent Plaintiff is the Eproductive female, and the Defendant is a doctor who belongs to the “C Hospital” located in the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).
B. On August 9, 2014, the Plaintiff complained of the left side ray, and was diagnosed by the Defendant as “on the outside side ray, etc. of the left side ray, etc.,” and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on August 9, 2014. On August 11, 2014, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on the ground that he received the “on the outside side ray of the front side ray, scambling of the outer side scambling, etc.” (hereinafter “the instant surgery”), and was discharged on August 18, 2014.
C. On August 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) removed the Plaintiff’s sacrife in the operation department; (b) fixed the Plaintiff’s left sacrife to the sacrine; (c) on September 18, 2014, removed the Plaintiff’s sacrife roof to remove sacrife and wear assistive devices; and (d) removed assistive devices on September 25, 2014; (b) confirmed that the Plaintiff was punished by the operation department on September 26, 2014; and (c) applied to the Defendant hospital; and (d) the Defendant prescribed the Plaintiff’s sacrife colony to the Plaintiff on September 30, 2014.
3) On October 6, 2014, the Plaintiff complained of the pain and heat in the department of the operation, and applied to the Defendant hospital. The Defendant hospitalized the Plaintiff, and again performed an anti-biotic eculculation on the left-hand side. From October 10, 2014, as a result of the MRI test on October 11, 2014, the Plaintiff was infected with the Plaintiff’s infection on the part of the operation, and as a result, on October 14, 2014, the Defendant discharged the Plaintiff from the point of view on October 14, 2014, and continued treatment, such as anti-biotic eculculic administration, while the Plaintiff’s symptoms were improved on the part of the Plaintiff’s operation, and on October 29, 2014, the Defendant discharged the Plaintiff on October 14, 2014.