2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On October 25, 2010, the Plaintiff: (a) purchased from the Defendant, who operates a furniture store called “C” in the name of “C” at KRW 22,00,000, the sales price was determined and purchased from the Defendant as a shock, ber, cremation, cremation, food deposit, living room, and sexual harassment (hereinafter “instant household”).

B. However, as the Plaintiff purchased the instant furniture for a long time, there were defects such as shocks, odors, and strawing the shape. Such defects are caused by the wind of the households in the process of extinguishing the fire of the said furniture operated by the Defendant.

C. The Defendant is liable for damages suffered by the Plaintiff as a tortfeasor who was the one who was a normal household and sold the households that were unable to sell due to the foregoing defects.

2. According to the results of the appraisal commission with respect to each of the images and appraiser D as to Gap evidence 3-1 to 6, the rupture and rupture occurred to the instant household, and the rupture and rupture arose to the instant household, the rupture and rupture were removed, the rupture part was removed, and the above defects were found to have been caused by the influence of the number.

Furthermore, as alleged by the plaintiff, although it is impossible to sell the instant household because it was flooded due to flood, it is insufficient to recognize the fact of deception as alleged by the plaintiff solely based on the results of the appraisal commission for Gap evidence Nos. 2, Gap evidence Nos. 3-1 through 6, Gap evidence Nos. 10-12, and appraiser evidence Nos. 10-12, and appraiser D, in light of the fact that the date and time of fire in the instant household store building operated by the defendant was October 22, 2009, which is one year earlier than the date on which the plaintiff purchased the instant household from the defendant.

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion is difficult to accept.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.