도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Criminal facts
1. On July 17, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 4.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and traffic law (drinking driving without a license) at the source of a water source on July 17, 2013, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 7 million due to a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) on November 4, 2013, and was sentenced to an electronic summary order of KRW 7 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) on more than two occasions.
On December 28, 2016, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle on December 22:15, 2016, driven a Cwelve in the section of about 5 km from 21-3 to 200km-ro, 0.1% of alcohol level in the blood alcohol level, and driving a Cwelve in the section of about 0.10% from the 21-3rd to the 5km-si road.
2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty to drive a motor vehicle in Catland Cost Sheet.
On December 28, 2016, the Defendant, as stated in paragraph 1, was under the influence of alcohol and without a license on December 22:15, 2016, driving of the Grandroth, and led to a round-down of the white distance on the surface of the wife population at the permissible time, to the inside of the air stop.
In such cases, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the front side and the left side and the left side, and to accurately manipulate the steering and brakes so as to prevent the accident from occurring.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so and neglected to take part in the front part of the Victim D(46)'s 14 tons of trucks E 14 tons of the victim D(46) under normal signals due to the negligence of bypassing it as it is, received the full part of the Lone Star Sheet.
Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop the truck and take necessary measures to prevent risks, etc., even though he/she damages the right to load the truck owned by the victim with approximately one million won of repair costs due to such occupational negligence.