However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 27, 2017, around 20:50, the Defendant boarded the train No. 159 of the Seoul Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, as it purchased legitimate boarding passes from 405 Seoul.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not purchase legitimate tickets, and there was no intention or ability to pay the fare because there was no money in the process.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victims’ Korean Railroad construction; and (b) exempted the payment of the fare of KRW 43,500 from Seoul to the East Daegu Station; and (c) obtained the same profit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each investigation report (including attached documents), Nos. 1, 4,10 (Evidence List 1, 4,10);

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( normal consideration, such as the reflection of the fact, the fact that there is no criminal record of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment, and the fact that the amount of damage is a small