2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The report on the survey of the forest land in Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, a Gyeonggi-do, which was made during the Japanese colonial era of land under the instant circumstances is indicated as G 5,100 square meters (hereinafter “the forest land in this case”) stating that the address of the G 5,100 square meters (hereinafter “H”) was under the circumstance of H, the address of which was “H”.

The forest of this case was destroyed by the 6.25 column, and cadastral records were destroyed on December 9, 1963.

B. The relationship between the parties to the instant case and the network I (1) died in the name of the date when I had been located at the permanent domicile of the Gyeonggi-gunJ, and the Republic of Korea became Australia for the reason of the division of Yong-Nam L. K was in the form of M (ma), N (ma), P (3), P (P), Q (4), R (5) and S (Nam 6). The Defendant is the children of P. K in the Republic of Korea. K was killed on August 16, 2016 in the Republic of Korea. On the other hand, the head of L was married with U and M in the form of the Plaintiff (ma), V (ma), W (ma), M (ma (ma), X (ma), and X (Nam).

L was killed on September 5, 1949; T on May 30, 1981; U on January 4, 1994; and V on March 19, 197, respectively.

C. P in the process of registration of preservation of ownership under the Act on Special Measures for the Management of Ownership (hereinafter “the letter of guarantee in this case”) was prepared with Y, Z, and AA, and attached it on June 15, 1989, filed an application for restoration of ownership under the Act on Special Measures for the Management of Restoration and Preservation of Land, etc. (Act No. 3627, Jan. 1, 1992; hereinafter “Special Measures Act”) to the owner under the Act on Special Measures for the Management of Restoration of Land, etc. and Registration of Preservation of Land, etc. (Act No. 3627, Jan. 1, 1992; hereinafter “Special Measures Act”) on November 5, 199, after undergoing the examination and decision on the owner’s restoration on May 20, 1991.

(hereinafter “instant preservation registration”). Next, on October 12, 2016, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer based on inheritance by agreement and division in the future of the Defendant.

(hereinafter “this case’s transfer registration”). 【No dispute over the grounds for recognition” and entry in Gap’s Evidence Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10

2. The assertion and judgment are made.