On December 7, 2012, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at KRW 07:15, and led to the left turn from the side of the written public corporation to the right-hand left-hand turn.

There is a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by proceeding with a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle in accordance with good faith.

Nevertheless, the Defendant violated the stop signal and got left by negligence, and received the part of the Defendant’s ewing and Ⅲ fluor, which was driven by the victim D, who was straight from the right-way to the right-way on the side of the patrol fire station at that time, as the part of the Defendant’s cargo loaded behind the driver’s seat of the truck.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, which requires approximately seven weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant did not violate the signal since the Defendant reported to the left-hand turn at the time of entering the instant intersection.

Therefore, it is argued that the defendant's left turn in violation of the signal was examined, and that the victim was proceeding in accordance with the straight-line signals and did not violate the signal.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., the Defendant consistently confirmed the process signal of the traffic signal installed on the front side of the instant accident from the investigative agency to the court of this case and stated that the Defendant entered the instant intersection in a full manner, and ② the collision part of the vehicle is the front part of the victim’s vehicle and the front part of the vehicle loaded on the Defendant’s vehicle.