도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The reasons for sentencing revealed by the lower court are as follows.
The Defendant appears to have committed a crime of this case by treating automobiles used for the crime of this case in other ways. In addition, the distance from which driving under the influence of alcohol and driving without obtaining a license is relatively short. The Defendant is in a position to support both her spouse and parents in the future because she has recently married her international marriage with Vietnam and her home care. On the other hand, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Road Traffic Act (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment, etc.).
Nevertheless, the Defendant, without being imprisoned, has repeatedly committed the crime of drinking and unlicensed driving of this case.
The blood alcohol concentration level itself of drinking driving is also 0.183% and 0.237%, and the risk of causing a traffic accident was also high.
In addition, the defendant is driving and driving under the influence of alcohol on February 25, 2016.