A. An overview of the parties 1) C filed a complaint on June 28, 2010 on the charge of evading compulsory execution against D’s spouse prior to the Plaintiff’s divorce, D’s former mother as C’s mother, and C’s former head, F’s head, and B’s head as C’s head. G is a person who appeared and testified as a witness in a lawsuit between the Plaintiff and D, and H was a police official in charge of the investigation of the case filed by the Plaintiff. 2) On September 28, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against D under the charge of evading compulsory execution, and the prosecutor of the original original district public prosecutor’s office rendered a disposition of having no authority to institute a prosecution against D in the case that was proceeded with by the Changwon District Public Prosecutor’s 2010 type444 on September 8, 2010

3) On February 8, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against G with the charge of perjury. On April 28, 2011, the Prosecutor of the Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a disposition that G was innocent on the ground of lack of evidence in the case conducted under Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office 201-type and 15969. 4) On September 27, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against C on September 27, 2012 with a minor under the charge of attracting a minor, intrusion upon residence, perjury, E, F, and B, and the Prosecutor of the Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office filed a complaint against each of the above perjury. On May 31, 2013, the Prosecutor of the Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office dismissed the disposition against C’s inducement of a minor, without any doubt against C’s suspicion of intrusion upon residence, and dismissed the disposition against C and D’s above evidence, and without any objection against CF’s indictment and E.

5) On August 13, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with H on the charge of abusing official authority and obstructing another’s exercise of rights, and the Prosecutor of the Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office (the original District Prosecutors’ Office), on December 27, 2013, rendered a disposition of dismissing the above charges of abusing official authority and obstructing another’s exercise of rights and obstructing another’s exercise of duties, and rendering a disposition of not being suspected of the above charges of neglecting official duties. (B) On May 12, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with H on the charge of abusing official authority and obstructing another’s exercise of rights and obstructing another’s exercise of rights and obstructing another’s exercise of duties with the original Prosecutors’ Office (No. 2010 type No. 44004) with D as a criminal suspect. The Plaintiff’s reading and copying of the case’s records related to the information listed in attached Table 1(1).