except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 22, 2016, at around 01:10, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, carried the alcohol at “Dju” located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and carried out an injury, such as brain dust, requiring approximately four weeks of medical treatment, to the victim E (the age of 49) who was drinking the alcohol on other tables. The Defendant: (a) 500cc bec bec bec bec bec beck, which is a dangerous object brought about by the Defendant; and (b) the victim, who was going beyond the floor, flading the victim’s bridge, flad with the Defendant’s bridge, flading the victim at one time, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as brain dust, requiring a medical treatment for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police suspect concerning F;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;

1. Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is highly dangerous, and that the degree of injury of the victim is not somewhat weak is disadvantageous.

However, the sentencing factors such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and motive leading to the crime have been determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and divided, the fact that the victim has compensated for and agreed on the damage is advantageous to the victim, and other factors of sentencing have been considered.