2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with A and entered into a taxi, and the defendant is an insurer that entered into an automobile insurance contract for a motor vehicle of sod with C.

A, around 18:13 on June 2, 2013, when driving a taxi and driving the taxi, a two-lanes in the vicinity of the four-distance intersection (hereinafter “instant intersection”) with no signal signal, etc. in the Yansan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do (hereinafter “instant intersection”), the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes, namely, the speed of 112km at a speed exceeding 60km per hour when the speed is restricted from the pentcheon-do to the waterside.

C At that time, the said A-to-p motor vehicle was driven by the driver of the said A-to-hand motor vehicle and proceeded to turn to the left on the left-hand side of the direction that A was proceeding. A then discovered the said A-to-pur motor vehicle, which was already entering the said intersection, late later, and left the wind to the right-hand side to avoid this, and then the fried motor vehicle was turned to the front part of the driver's seat of the si and the utility pole and street (hereinafter referred to as the "accident in this case").

[Grounds for recognition] The plaintiff's assertion that there is no dispute over Gap's 1, 2, 10 through 14, 16, 17, 18, and Eul's 1 through 4 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)'s assertion of the whole purport of the pleading, and the plaintiff's assertion that the whole purport of the pleading was damaged by the accident of this case. The plaintiff, a mutual aid company, bears a total of 13,853,160 won for the repair cost of utility poles and street lamps.

A is binding on A, but C also enters the intersection where safe operation was required because no signal, etc. exists and safety protection is installed due to road expansion works, and thereby turn to the left, C did not properly examine the progress of other vehicles to enter the intersection and proceed to the road with a wide width while making a left turn on the narrow road.