If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On June 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of the D, which is located in C of the Glindong-gun, G, the Defendant: (b) on June 30, 2017; and (c) requested F to present personal information from F, a police officer of the E District Police Station, who is a police officer of the E District, belonging to the Glindong-gun, to appear; (b) whether C, a C, a police officer

In this paper, I explained that he will be able to perform the duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of police officers by assaulting the F's chest part on several occasions with arms and head, and walking the F's right buck part on one occasion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to F and G;

1. Each statement of H, G, and I;

1. J's self-written statement;

1. Application of statutes to on-site photographs;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions of the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime are determined by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order and other conditions of the sentencing indicated in the record.

- The crime of this case is an act of violence to a police officer dispatched by the defendant after receiving a report of violence under the influence of alcohol, and the nature and circumstances of the crime are not good.

The defendant is led to confession and is in depth against himself.

- The Defendant has no criminal history prior to the instant case.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. On June 30, 2017, at around 00:45, the Defendant left the victim H (17 years of age) and G (20 years of age) with no justifiable reason, the summary of the facts charged showed that “A few years of age must move away from the left side of H, walking down the chest part of H’s chest in a number of arms, walkinging off the outside part of G, walking back one time, and selling part of his chest part.

The defendant continues to contact G.