[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2-1, 2-2, Gap evidence 3-8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The defendant's assertion on the defendant D's assertion argues that in the related criminal cases, the plaintiff A filed a compensation order with respect to the amount of KRW 40,000,000,000, which is obtained by deceptive money, and the plaintiff B received a compensation order with respect to the amount of KRW 30,000,000,000, respectively, the plaintiffs' claim of this case should

According to the statements in 1 to 3 of the evidence No. 8, evidence No. 8, and evidence No. 1 to 3, Seoul Central District Court 2015Dahap974, 9555 (combined), 1010 (Consolidated), and 1021 (Consolidated), the plaintiffs filed an application for each compensation order with the above court on April 4, 2016 from the above court, and the above court rendered a compensation order to jointly pay the plaintiff A the amount of KRW 40,000,000, and the amount of KRW 30,00,000,000, respectively, obtained by the plaintiff B. The above judgment of the court of first instance cannot be recognized as being dismissed in all of the plaintiffs' compensation applications in Seoul High Court 2016No961, which was appealed by the defendant D and the prosecutor. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.