beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.08.20 2020고정270

청소년보호법위반

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the head of the “C” entertainment drinking club in Jincheon-gun B.

The owner and employee of an entertainment drinking house shall not allow juveniles to enter the entertainment drinking house, and no one shall sell drugs harmful to juveniles, such as alcoholic beverages, to juveniles.

Nevertheless, around 01:00 on November 28, 2019, the Defendant did not verify the age of Do (16 years of age) a juvenile, and allowed the said juvenile to enter the said entertainment drinking house, and sold the said juvenile and his/her day-to-day 20 beer of the two weeks of the two weeks of the two weeks of juvenile drug.

Summary of Evidence

1. Receipts of each police suspect's interrogation protocol of the defendant D, and E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 59 subparagraph 6 of the Juvenile Protection Act, Article 28 (1) of the Juvenile Protection Act (hereafter referred to as "sale of harmful substances to juveniles"), Article 59 subparagraph 8 of the Juvenile Protection Act, Article 29 (2) of the Juvenile Protection Act (hereafter referred to as "permission for access to establishments banned from access by juveniles"), the selection

1. From among concurrent crimes, a fine of one million won to be imposed under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the grounds that Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (the fact that there are some circumstances to consider the circumstances of the instant case, such as the fact that there is no specific criminal history, not only once a fine is imposed on the Defendant, but also the fact that an adult who had been a guest prior to the time was accompanied by the act of driving together, etc.) is higher