A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and a fine of 300,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

The defendants constitute another committee for the management of apartment houses, separate from the committee for the management of apartment houses in Pakistan-si, and there is a dispute concerning the management of the election management of the above apartment.

From April 5, 2016 to April 19, 2016, Defendants: (a) before holding a vote for dismissal of E, the chairperson of the meeting for occupants of the above apartment; (b) before holding the voting for dismissal, the committee for the management of victims’ election, attached a written public notice stating the details related to the election for dismissal on the bulletin board of each apartment unit; and (c) had an attempt to remove the occupant of the above apartment from

1. On April 13, 2016, around 12:12, 2016, Defendant A removed, in his hand, a notice of “the reason for dismissal of the chairperson of the representative meeting of occupants” produced and attached by the Committee for the Management of Victims in an elevator consisting of No. 506 Dong 1-2, and thereby preventing other occupants from viewing the said notice. From April 13, 2016 to April 13:20, 2016, Defendant A removed a notice of 40 times in total, such as the first re-written list of crimes in attached Form 1, thereby preventing other occupants from viewing the said notice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the election management of the victim election commission by force.

2. Defendant B, around April 14, 2016, removed the public notice written in paragraph (1) from the above apartment on the elevator No. 511-2, Dong-dong 511-2, thereby preventing other residents from viewing the public notice written. From April 14, 2016 to April 22:10, 2016, Defendant B removed the public notice written in total three times as shown in the attached Table No. 2 of the daily list of crimes from around April 14, 2016 to around April 18, 2016, thereby preventing other residents from viewing the said notice written public notice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the election management of the victim election commission by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Grounds for the dismissal of the chairperson of the representative council of occupants;