However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A, as a business owner operating illegal games in Ulsan-gu D and 1st floor, established and operated 6 PCs for outdoor games, and the Defendant B was willing to perform duties such as money exchange, settlement, etc. as an employee of the above game room.

1. No person who violates the Game Industry Promotion Act shall provide game products for distribution or use, or display or store them for such purposes;

Nevertheless, from June 29, 2012 to September 3, 2012, Defendant A provided an unspecified customer who had been found in the above game room with six PC units, which are game products not rated in the above illegal game room, from August 17, 2012 to September 3, 2012.

As a result, the Defendants provided game products that did not receive a grade jointly for use, and displayed the game products for this purpose.

2. Defendants in violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc., enter 10,000 won in cash to many unspecified customers as stated in paragraph (1), such as the date and place described in paragraph (1), and made them operate the “matomato” game machine, which is a speculative machine, and put up points according to the pre-determined rate according to the result of the rupture, and upon the request of the said customers for exchange, sold approximately KRW 16,850,000 in cash for about 67 days by exchanging KRW 10,000 per 10,000.

As a result, the Defendants jointly carried out speculative acts using speculative machines, and at the same time carried out exchange of points obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement prepared in E, F, G, H, and I;

1. Seizure records;

1. Business books which are reported to be investigated, seized and seized; and