If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant, who is engaged in the distribution business of miscellaneous equipment, KON, etc. with the trade name of “B”, has been using the account of “D”, “B”, and “E” in Internet social network service C.

The Defendant, who became aware through the Internet, did not engage in the long-term sales business with the Defendant, and was trying to run a business different from the Victim J (S, 42 years old) who was working in the account of the name of “G”, “H”, and “I” in the above C, and became the victim and the victim in the above C, etc.

In Internet social network services C, the Defendant and the victim were punished, and around November 23, 2014, the Defendant referred the victim to the Defendant’s mobile phone from Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul to the Defendant’s mobile phone in the Defendant’s bulletin board “(b) letter of intimidation and the K in part.”

The same shall apply to the so-called snick snicking in this place.

In addition to the phrase “for those who look at money,” the victim’s account, posts, and photographs of conversations posted to make it possible for many and unspecified visitors to view the victim. In addition, the victim publicly insultingd the victim at least eight times in total from August 22, 2014 to January 19, 2015, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness J and F;

1. Results of verification of the original of photograph of the closure of a course;

1. Each police statement made to J and F;

1. Each petition filed by J;

1. Each police investigation report (in addition to evidential data of complainants and submission of additional evidential data by complainants);

1. Along with the fact that a copy was submitted by printing out the original screen without any artificial opening during the output process, the victim or a third party’s melted or melting the original screen without any permission, among the parts (Evidence Nos. 6), such as the KF screen (Evidence No. 16) and the closure screen (Evidence No. 16);

The admissibility of evidence may be admitted unless there are special circumstances to suspect.