beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.24 2015고단3990

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2015 Highest 3990" lacks the ability to distinguish things or make decisions due to netism, etc.

At around 17:00 on July 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around the E hotel entrance in Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) on the 112-report that the Defendant satisfing and satisfing the Defendant’s happiness; and (c) on the part of the F Zone of the Seoul Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Police Station F Zone G did not have a normal conversation with the Defendant; and (d) as the Defendant did not take a protective measure against the Defendant, the Defendant’s contact address is deemed necessary without any justifiable reason; (b) the Defendant was informed of the Defendant’s contact address; and (c) the face of the said G was satfing once by his own fault; (d) the said G determined to take the protective measure against the Defendant in the said district in the currency with the Defendant’s children;

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

The defendant of "2015 Highest 5210" has weak ability to distinguish things or make decisions due to netism, etc.

At around 14:00 on August 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) intending to enter the Cheongdae, in front of the I coffee shop located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) intending to set up on the roadway, and (c) intending to set up on the roadway, on the ground that J and Gyeong K are prevented, the Defendant set the lower part of the said J on the ground that she was set up at the 2nd parallel belonging to the 2nd group of Seoul, Seoul, the working party, set up one time, set the two directions of J on the one hand; (b) she set up one time at the left part of the said K, which was to restrain the Defendant’s assault; and (c) she assaulted both parties three times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement on G, J, K, and L;

1. Photographs, CDs;

1. A report on internal investigation, a report on internal investigation, and a statement of the phone of a witness;