Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

1. 모욕 피고인은 2019. 4. 21. 03:52경 광주시 B에 있는 피고인이 거주하는 아파트 관리사무실 앞에서, ‘남성 1명이 찾아와 행패를 부린다.’는 112신고를 받고 출동한 광주경찰서 C지구대 소속 경찰관이자 피해자인 경위 D, 경장 E, 순경 F, 순경 G에게 술에 취해 화가 나 관리실 직원 2명이 있고, 불특정 다수가 지나다니는 노상임에도 “관리실과 유착관계 있냐, 썅.. 젊은 새끼가 싸가지 없네, 개새끼야 씹새끼야. 어린 놈의 새끼가 ”, “야이 새끼야, 이런 좆같은게.. 씹할놈이” 등 수회에 걸쳐 큰소리로 욕설하여 피해자들을 공연히 모욕하였다.

2. The Defendant, while drinking at the time and place set forth in Paragraph (1) of the same Article, had the police officers fluencing the above police officers, and flucing them with the words “fluoring the fluence” from the above flucing E, took three times the above flucence E in drinking.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigation and 112 reported duties.

3. On April 21, 2019, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, around 04:30 on April 21, 2019, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led police officers to a very rough and disorderly speech and behavior at a public office, by drinking for about 30 minutes of desire, such as “the same kind of fluence, the relationship of oil,” which reads “at least 40 minutes.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police statements and inquiries about E;

1. A complaint;

1. The circumstantial statement and investigation report (the investigation of the same image);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph of a closure and obstructing the performance of official duties of the defendant;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of revocation by the government office) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act.