2. The judgment of the reasons for appeal of this case is recognized and against all of the crimes of this case, and there are circumstances that can be considered in light of the circumstances such as the victim's failure to want the punishment of the defendant, but the court below seems to have sentenced the punishment in full consideration of these circumstances. In particular, even though the nature of the crime is not good in that the defendant went to the crime of this case during the repeated crime period of the same crime, it seems that the decision of the court below is already sufficiently preferred to the sentence of the fine, and even if considering all the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as character, character, environment, health conditions, and the circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.