부정처사후수뢰
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who has been engaged in the control and investigation of sexual traffic from March 2004 to February 2009 at the Gyeongnam Provincial Police Agency's living safety and C.
The Defendant committed an unlawful act in a manner that did not register E with the investigation management system without justifiable grounds, even though he/she investigated the suspect of sexual traffic against E, who is the manager of management department of D on October 2007 or around November 2007.
1. The Defendant, from November 2007 to February 2, 2008, demanded that “A restaurant, etc. where the trade name of the H building site is unknown throughout several times, the Defendant is operating a business installing the bridge F, which is installed so that it can work at a high place in the construction work, and a sign for the passage and work of materials transport or workmen.” From the week, F, from the window G of the city of Changwon, demanded that “A request F, from the week, to allow the construction of the bridge of H building constructed at the window G of the city of Changwon.”
As a result, the defendant committed an unlawful act as a public official and demanded the above E to give a bribe, which is an opportunity to establish a non-intercing construction work for F, a third party in return for this act.
2. From February 2008 to June 2008, the Defendant requested that the Defendant “F, a branch, was unable to perform the installation of the J Apartments construction work” due to the method of making phone calls to the above E during several times. Accordingly, F, from the home page page I, demanded that E be able to undertake the construction of the J Apartments construction work in the window page I of Changwon-si, and around June 2008, E introduced the said F to the said subcontractor, who is the subcontractor of the said apartment construction work, and ordered the said subcontractor to perform the construction work in the amount of KRW 40 million,00,000,000 for the construction cost from the said K.
As a result, the defendant committed an unlawful act as a public official, and caused the above E to give F a bribe called a bribe of non-establishment and construction work in return for the objection.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;