However, as to the Defendants, it shall be for one year from the date of each judgment.

On September 28, 2013, at around 07:05 on September 28, 2013, Defendants: (a) committed theft with sublimbing 31.5km equivalent to the market value of the victim’s possession in the orchard cultivated by the victim E in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si using the gaps in which the surveillance of the victim was neglected.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. E statements;

1. Application of statutes on the site and photographs of damaged articles;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) shall take into account all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant reflects the crime, that the defendant A has no criminal record other than