On October 14, 2016, at around 14:30, the Defendants, jointly with C, committed assault against the victim by entering the meeting place of the representative of the commercial building on the ground that the victim and the F attorney-at-law selected as a temporary manager at the court, etc. were in progress in the meeting of the representative of the commercial building by excluding them, and Defendant B, Defendant A, and C, respectively, committed assault against the victim by means of cutting down the victim’s head debt with their own hand and breaking down the breath, and pushinging the victim’s breath.

Judgment

In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone proves that the Defendants committed an assault by means of cutting off E’s head debt and sculing E’s e-bat and pushing ahead with e-bating, with each hand, beyond reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Since the arguments and statements of G and H, which are the hostile witness, and the defendants' arguments and statements against E and the defendants who accused the defendants, the following neutral witness's statements and their statements should be weighted in the court's statements.

- At the time of the Defendants’ entry into the office which is the place of the instant case, there were also police officers who had been dispatched to the site. However, during the dispatch police officers, I stated that “C head debt” was “C E” and J slope stated that “C faces E face.” However, the Defendants assaulted E.

No police officer who stated shall make a statement.

- At the time of the instant case, the Secretary General of the Commercial Building Management Group participated in the meeting of the representative of the commercial building

K showed that this Court "E is in the state of the head debt collection against E.S.".