A and C shall be punished by each fine of five million won, and the defendant B and D shall be punished by each fine of three million won.

To the extent that there is no concern about actual disadvantage to the defendants' exercise of their respective defense rights, rhyth of the facts charged without changing the indictment and recognize the facts constituting a crime by making a clerical error clear

Defendant

B is a corporation for the purpose of water supply and sewerage construction business, and Defendant A is its representative director, and Defendant D is a corporation for the purpose of civil engineering construction business, etc., Defendant C is its internal director.

The development of Youngwon Industry Co., Ltd. was awarded a subcontract for the construction works of landscaping facilities among the construction works of military sports unit relocation projects contracted by the Korea Land Corporation, and the defendant B Co., Ltd is the subcontractor who re-subcontracted the construction works of landscaping facilities among the above landscaping projects.

No subcontractor shall further subcontract any construction works he/she has subcontracted to any third person.

1. On May 30, 2012, Defendant A subcontracted the said construction work to D Co., Ltd., which was a representative director, even though he/she subcontracted the construction of landscaping facilities, at a law firm office located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-dong, Incheon.

2. Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant, committed the same offense as that of paragraph (1) in relation to the Defendant’s business.

3. On May 31, 2012, Defendant C subcontracted the said construction to a new construction industry corporation with E, etc. as the representative director, at the newspaper, the Saemaul F1 depository office located in the Sin Sung-si, Sin Sung-si, and even if D subcontracted the construction of the above landscaping facilities, as set forth in paragraph (1).

4. The Defendant D Co., Ltd., an employee of the Defendant C, committed the same offense as that of the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the proxy C of the defendant A, B, and defendant D and the defendant D

1. Prosecutions on F.