However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 04:00 on September 12, 2013, the Defendant pointed out that the victim drinking alcohol, such as the victim and his living woman, E, etc., was erroneous for the past E at the house of the victim D, which was located in Sungnam-si C2, Sungnam-si, and that the victim, who was suffering from drinking alcohol, was broken off with the wall, and then the victim, who was faced with the disease, was arguing against the Defendant by threatening to display the shoulder-sicker’s disease, which is a dangerous object, and tightly tightly tightly tightly harming the Defendant, the victim was faced with a deadly weapons (the total length of 23cm, the blade length of 12cm) to defend the victim, thereby causing the victim to suffer injuries from the number of days treated by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol to D

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Considerations, etc. agreed with the victim);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;