However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment in the name of “F” with six smuggling rooms, two shower rooms, and other facilities, such as CCTV, in the Suwon-si E and five floors.

On September 25, 2014, around 00:05, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 80,000 in cash from a police officer who pretended to be a male customer at the above business establishment as the price for sexual traffic; and (b) directed the above police officer as the smuggling, and (c) brought sexual traffic women waiting at the above business establishment into the above smuggling in order to have them do the act of similarity using his/her hand; and (d) brought them into the above smuggling from August 3, 2014 to August 3, 2014.

9. Until December 25, 2007, sexual traffic was arranged for business by the above means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each statement of G, H, I, and J;

1. Application of F Advertising, CCTV, internal photograph, and business registration certificate under statutes;

1. Punishment of the act of arranging sexual traffic, Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, and choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;