beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.07.23 2014재나81

소유권이전등기

Text

1. All of the lawsuits for retrial of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the review shall be borne by the defendant (the plaintiff and the selected party).

Reasons

1. The following facts are recognized by the records of this case or are significant to this court:

1) The decision subject to review becomes final and conclusive and conclusive in Suwon-si (the administrative district was changed later to the Young-gu.

(2) The plaintiff was established for the purpose of implementing a reconstruction project of D and 6 lots of land and 6.2, and the plaintiff filed an application for parcelling-out within the period of application for parcelling-out, and filed an application for parcelling-out, and filed an application with the defendant and the appointed party B for an agreement for cash liquidation, and filed an application with the defendant and the appointed party B for an alteration of KRW 138,780,000 from the plaintiff, and at the same time filed an application with the defendant and the appointed party B for an alteration of KRW 138,780,00 from the plaintiff, KRW 130,00,000, KRW 61.152/176,040, KRW 9/10 of the real estate stated in attached Table 1 and KRW 20,000, KRW 15,420,000 with the defendant and the 6.30,0000,0000,000 won for ownership transfer registration for each of the plaintiff's claim 16.