The victim C entered the Republic of Vietnam with the introduction of the defendant around 2011 after marriage between Vietnam and Vietnam, and his wife left the Republic of Korea at 40 days after his entry into the Republic of Korea on August 30, 201, and re-reconvened with Vietnam women around August 30, 201.

As above, the Defendant was accused of a complaint regarding the withdrawal of the preceding place introduced by the Defendant from the injured party, and around November 28, 2012, the victim was called the victim by telephone at around 14:02.

At any time, it is essential to conclude this gal, if you want to meet or call the test, and you speak that the crime is transmitted.

By the 10th day of the No. D, one time is found in considering the D case, and any judgment is made.

The report judgment is shurbling, and if so, will be passed now.

Whether or not the family is refused to do so.

We need to say that the nature of the match is very important.

One water is not absolutely set.

Mason's finite finite's finites threatened the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of one CD;

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 283 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (1) of the suspended sentence (300,000 won in penalty, 100,000 won in penalty, 300,000 won per day in custody): Various circumstances shown in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances leading to disputes, including several criminal complaints between the Defendant and the victim, and the level of speaking made by the Defendant