However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 피고인은 2016. 10. 13. 01:49 경 부천시 B 건물, 1 층에 있는 피해자 C이 운영하는 ‘D 정육점 ’에 이르러 자물쇠로 시정되어 있는 샷 시를 평소 소지하고 있던 열쇠를 이용하여 열고 위 정육점 내부로 침입한 다음, 테이블 아래에 보관되어 있는 가방에서 피해자 소유의 현금 1,220,000원을 꺼내

L. A. L. theft was committed.

2. 피고인은 2016. 10. 17. 03:28 경 위 제 1 항 기재 장소에 이르러 시정되어 있지 않은 샷 시를 열고 위 정육점 내부로 침입한 다음, 포스 기( 현금 보관함) 안에 보관되어 있는 피해자 소유의 현금 100,000원을 꺼내

L. A. L. theft was committed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on occurrence;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph and CCTV recording data;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order [the scope of recommendation] / [the person who has been subject to special mitigation] in the mitigation area (8 to 1 year and 6 months) / [the decision of sentence] of the punishment of this case / The crime of this case was committed in consideration of the following circumstances: (a) the defendant intrudes on the frighty ground where he works for him twice and steals the total amount of 1.3 million won and consumes it for entertainment expenses; (b) the defendant reflects his mistake; (c) the defendant has agreed to pay 3 million won to the victim; (d) the victim has no record of the same suspension of execution or higher; (e) the defendant has to support his family; and (e) the defendant's age, sex behavior; and (e) the circumstances after the crime.