2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared to the lower court’s failure to submit new sentencing data in the trial, and the circumstances alleged by the prosecutor on the ground of unfair sentencing are deemed to have been reflected in the grounds for sentencing by the lower court. In full view of the following circumstances, the lower court’s sentencing is not deemed unfair because the lower court’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime were committed, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant records and arguments, including the following circumstances.

Therefore, the prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.