1. Fraud against victim F;

A. On April 25, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F, “I would like to make an investment in the business as to whether I would like to make the victim’s house located in the He apartment complex in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is located in 870, with the aim of “I would like to make an investment of 3% per month when I would like to guarantee the principal if I would make an investment of KRW 10,000,000,000.” On April 25, 2013, I would like to make a false statement to the effect that I would like to make the victim’s house in the victim F, which is located in the He apartment complex in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is located in the He apartment complex, with this easy money through this waterproofing business.”

However, there was no fact that the defendant carried out the aforesaid waterproofing supply business, and there was no intention or ability to pay the principal and profits to the victim, even if he receives the money from the victim as the investment fund for the waterproofinginginginging supply business.

Around May 14, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the bank account in the name of the Defendant.

B. On June 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, at the victim F’s house located in the H apartment complex in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Defendant “The Defendant is running an tecotata business with the vice president who had worked together before, and is now going to be more reliable. It is now entering the EL only several Hague Corporation. The Defendant would guarantee the principal and receive 5% of the monthly income from the investment of the money.”

However, the fact was that the defendant did not engage in the above tecota supply business, and that the defendant was planned to pay the tecota loan business with money from the victim.