Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The reasoning of this court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) additional evidence submitted by the court of first instance, which is insufficient to reverse the facts acknowledged by the court of first instance; (b) additional statement of evidence No. 21, which is insufficient to reverse the facts acknowledged by the court of first instance; and (c) the third 16th 16th of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the defendant shall be the defendant's wife E (F's husband, i.e., the defendant's husband) who is the defendant's wife, is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the defendant'