If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a self-employed person, and C is a director of the office of attorney-at-law office, who is between the defendant and the defendant, and the victim D (ma, 47 years old) is a hotel building contract relationship.

At around 14:55 on August 20, 2012, the Defendant, jointly with C, was fluored in a f branch G and hotel site contract relationship within the F branch office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, for the reason that the head of the above branch office does not return the down payment, the Defendant was fluored on the ground that the Defendant was “fluorous fluort fluor” against the Defendants, and that the Defendant was fluoring the victim’s fluor, and that C expressed the victim’s desire to “the same fluore”, and the Defendant was fluoring the victim’s fluoring the victim’s fluor on the floor of hand, on the ground that he expressed the victim’s fluor, which requires treatment for about 10 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 27 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;