On May 11:35, 2019, the Defendant driven a car with B B, and proceeded along a two-lane road in front of the D station in Jinju City C from the Jinyang to the E side of the D station.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, there was a duty of care to thoroughly operate the front line and safely in the maintenance of the tea line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the front portion of the freight vehicle in front of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle, which was driven by the negligence of entering the opposite lane beyond the median line and driving in the opposite lane (58 years old).

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered from the victim H (the 84 years old), who was the passenger of the above cargo, about five weeks of treatment, the right 1 balance, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment to the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to traffic accident reports, accident-related photographs, and medical certificates;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Commercial concurrence and choice of punishment: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act, which affected the central line of reasons for sentencing imprisonment without prison labor, causing victims to suffer heavy

It is judged that the damage has been aggravated because the vehicle has not been properly operated immediately after the accident.

On the other hand, it has not been punished for the last ten years or more, and the accident vehicle is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance.