2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

가. 원고 1) 주위적으로, 원고는 형(兄) C의 지인인 피고에게 2013. 12. 20. 20,000,000원, 2014. 3. 14. 20,000,000원, 2014. 5. 12. 10,000,000원을 변제기를 정하지 않고 대여하였다. 원고는 위 돈을 누나인 D을 통하여 피고에게 송금하였는데, D이 원고에 대한 채무를 변제하는 것에 갈음하여 원고의 요청에 따라 피고에게 돈을 송금한 것이다. 따라서 피고는 원고에게 차용금 합계 50,000,000원을 변제할 의무가 있다. 2) 예비적으로 원고가 피고에게 지급한 돈을 투자금으로 본다면, 피고는 원고에게 투자에 대한 정산금 30,000,000원을 지급할 의무가 있다.

B. The defendant did not borrow money from the plaintiff.

The defendant purchased products such as Hegel and sold them on the Internet and made a profit-making business, and C has invested in the defendant's business.

2. The defendant's defense of this case is a defense that the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case is unlawful by being delegated only to the litigation of 50 million won by C without a special title, and the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case is filed by a person who is not a party.

In a lawsuit for performance, the plaintiff's own claim, whose level of party is nominal, and the determination is absorptiond into the judgment on the propriety of the claim, so the claimant is a legitimate plaintiff, and the person asserted as the obligor is a legitimate defendant.

(Supreme Court Decision 94Da14797 delivered on June 14, 194) In the lawsuit of this case, the plaintiff asserted that he lent 50,000,000 won to the defendant as a right holder. Thus, in accordance with the claim itself, the plaintiff has the standing to be a party to the lawsuit of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's main defense is without merit.

3. The plaintiff, who is the plaintiff, has transferred KRW 50,000 to the defendant as to the main claim of the plaintiff.