2. The Defendant, who recognized all of the instant crimes, reflects his mistake.

In the court below's decision, the victims of crimes Nos. 1 to 5 per annum, and the victims of crimes in attached Form Nos. 15, 29, 30, 32, 34 per annum in attached Form Nos. 15, 29, 30, 32, and 32 in attached Form Nos. 32 in attached Form Nos. 32 in the judgment of the court below.

The parents of the defendant's parents are also maintaining social ties such as entering into agreements with victims on behalf of the defendant.

However, each of the crimes of this case is likely to cause damage to the soundness of online trading order and to create a bona fide victims in collusion with B or by itself as if the defendant sells contact diskettes, etc. on the Internet, and it is not actually supplied the goods by receiving the payment from 46 victims, and thereby, the crime of this case is heavy.

In addition to the number of crimes committed by the accused, the amount of fraud shall be 24 million won, as well as the amount of fraud.

Up to the trial of the party, the victims who did not reach an agreement with the majority of victims are still seeking punishment for the defendant.

In 2013, there is a high possibility of further criticism in that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud and completed the execution of the sentence, and even during the period of repeated crime, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case under the same law as before.

In addition to the above circumstances, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive for committing a crime, circumstances after committing a crime, equity in punishment among accomplices, etc. and the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, and the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee (one year to three years and September) [the type of imprisonment].