beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.09.20 2017고단3184

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who was operating C in selling products related to the above brand from July 2013 to May 2016, as a person who was entitled to use domestic trademarks of "B", a liquid brand of France, and operated the said brand-related product from around July 2013 to May 2016. The Defendant, around May 2015, became aware of the victim F in the name of "E" in the name of "E" in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and became aware of the fact that he/she came to know of the victim F in the clothing wholesale and distribution business, etc. at the venue in the venue in the lock-gu G department store, etc., operated by the Defendant, “the victim while working as a trademark exclusive licensee at the place in the lock-gu G department store, etc., the funeral service is too good.”

It is hard to say that there is no "goods" or "goods".

The end of the month includes money.

In the “3 to 4 months,” the articles are well prepared in advance, so they may be supplied to the “G department stores.” The articles may be received in advance, because they may receive leading gold when supplied to the “G department stores.”

If a person is supplied with clothing due to ‘', etc., he/she continued to request the victim to supply clothing in accordance with ‘B' as if he/she would be able to fully pay the price.

At around October 2015, the Defendant provided the victim with B trademark, such as the Manlust, Mad, Mad, and Cheongban, to pay the victim within one week from the date of receiving the sales proceeds, if the Defendant provided the victim with the B trademark, such as the Manlust, Mad, and Cheongban.

“False speech” was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant was liable for a large amount of debt up to KRW 80 million, and it was extremely difficult to manage the company due to the failure to pay a small amount of wages to its employees. Even if the clothing received from the injured party was sold, it was thought that the amount would be used as repayment of the existing debt, office operating expenses, etc., and the price of the goods is paid.