However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[2016 Highest 8200]

1. On September 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) demanded the victim to pay KRW 50,000 per day while drunk at the F Manpower Office operated by the victim E in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu around September 12, 2016; (b) the victim refused it; (c) the Defendant demanded the victim to continue to pay 50,000 won per day; and (d) C demanded the victim to pay bitch son’s bitch son’s bitch son’s bitch son

It has interfered with the operation of the victim's human resources office by force for about 20 minutes by avoiding disturbance, such as hinginging a hale, hinging a bath, and hinging a sound.

2. The Defendant obstructing the performance of official duties, C, and C, at the date and time specified in paragraph 1, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, there is a defect that the slope H belonging to the Incheon Central Police Station G District of the Incheon Central Police Station attempted to arrest the Defendant, C, as a suspicion of interference with the duties of the Defendant, C, and C, “Ig police officials are subject to booms, and the shots are dead.

“In doing a bath, the Defendant was assaulted, such as taking the Ha’s side h’s hand to C, while walking the Ha’s side h’s h’s hand.

Accordingly, the defendant and C interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and E;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the police officer did not recover from damage, but that the police officer agreed with the victim E smoothly and that the police officer