If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

1. On January 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C (hereinafter “victim”) who was aware of his knowledge at the Defendant’s house located in the Nam-gu building B (hereinafter “Defendant”) in the Seocho-gu Office of the Defendant at the Seocho-gu Office of 201, stating that “If the amount to be used individually is necessary, 3 million won will be repaid after one month, if the Defendant borrowed it.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any occupation at the time and did not have any income, and even if he borrowed money from others, he did not have any intention or ability to complete payment.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 3 million won as the borrowed money from the injured party, i.e., the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given money by deceiving the victim.

2. On December 21, 2010, the Defendant stated “E” entertainment points operated by the injured party in D as “E”, that “The Defendant’s indictment of KRW 10 million in light of other business places is KRW 1 million. However, according to the written indictment and evidence, the Defendant’s correction is apparent that it is a clerical error of KRW 10 million.

A false statement was made that “I will complete payment with work at Libye House,” which reads that I will complete payment.

However, the defendant was unable to work due to disease, and there was no intention or ability to work as an employee of the entertainment shop.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received from the injured party the remittance of KRW 10,00,000 from his seat to his name in an unsound account under the pretext of borrowing money.

Accordingly, the defendant was given money by deceiving the victim.

3. On April 12, 201, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would lend KRW 1300,000 to the Defendant who will pay off the Defendant with his/her work to the Defendant, who will lend the KRW 1.3 million to the Defendant.”

However, the defendant was unable to work due to disease, and there was no intention or ability to work as an employee of the entertainment shop.

Nevertheless, the defendant, however, has been borrowed from the injured party.