However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) informed the victim’s right knee knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne

2. On April 24, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, within the F police box located in the north-gu, Northern-si, Ma on April 18, 2018, who received 112 reports on the charges of such bodily injury and voluntarily accompanied the Defendant by the police box to the Defendant, and received questioning from the police officer G belonging to the police station of the Posing Port Police Station of the Republic of Korea, who voluntarily accompanied the Defendant to ask him about his personal information.

“A person who assaults G at one time on the face of G in drinking.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and the point of injuring the option of punishment: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of imprisonment) interference with the performance of official duties: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The circumstances that are disadvantageous to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, namely, the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties of this case and causing bodily injury to a taxi driver while refusing to pay the taxi fee, such as taking a food face within the police box against a police officer who was performing legitimate duties, etc., while refusing to perform the official duties of this case and refusing to pay the taxi fee, in light of each mode of the crime of injury of this case, the nature of the crime is bad, the criminal records that have been punished twice as a violent crime are favorable to the fact that the victim D of the crime of injury did not want the punishment of the defendant, and there is no record of violent crime exceeding the fine.